Barb Vann's Web Site

Transformative Leader of Business, People, and Information Technology

Decision Making – Tips for implementation effectiveness

Posted by Barb on October 16th, 2009

First of all, thanks to everyone that sent me gentle reminders on where is your next post? I am glad to know that a number of folks find these blog posts interesting and useful!

Today I am writing about an aspect of decision making. Making decisions and executing to these decisions is a critical component to  driving improved change and making forward progress towards your objectives. However, too often companies and people struggle trying to make “the right” decisions. Elements of a good decision often include the decision quality, implementation effectiveness, and timeliness. Recently I attended a webinar on making better decisions faster. There were a couple of ideas that really resonated with me and the experiences I have had when trying to drive decision making and executing to the decisions made. The ideas presented below really speak to the implementation effectiveness aspect of decision making.

1) Treat decisions as a project not a process. While a decision making process such as Kepner-Tregoe Decision Making can be useful in providing a framework for making balanced decisions, the key is to use the process to help you make the decision. When you treat a decision as a project it will have a beginning and an end.

2) Don’t reopen a decision unless there is a compelling reason to do so. Any decision will run into bumps in the road as you execute it. When you make the decision, also specify what would need to change to cause you to reopen the decision. The military uses the Commander’s Critical Information Requirements (CCIR) to deal with this issue. Once the decision has been made take time to talk about what are the 4-5 critical points that would trigger a conversation about changing a decision? If none of the CCIR’s change, the operation goes ahead as planned. This is extremely valuable for teams to be able to know when they should escalate or engage in further discussion as they are taking action on the decision.

3) The presenter did not mention this directly, but I think it is absolutely critical that once a decision is made that you define the next step of action – the action should be an activity that drives you closer to achieving the results of the decision made. I once worked at a place that really excelled at making decisions, however, they did not always define the next set of actions and as a result we kept re-visiting the decision. A word to the wise, keep the momentum of the decision making moving forward and define the next action step.

There are obviously many other factors that play in to making good decisions faster, but the above 3 are not always mentioned and I think they are important components.

Bookmark and Share

3 Responses to “Decision Making – Tips for implementation effectiveness”

  1. Saqib Ali Says:

    Barb,

    Excellent post.

    We often fall in the trap of re-evaluating decisions, which keeps us from executing upon it. I think the problem stems from lack of proper decision making tools and processes. Right now we exchange emails to come to a decision. However, email is where the information goes to die. The information that was used to come to decision, is lost in the threads in the Inbox. And once the decision has been made, it is transferred to PowerPoint for review by upper management. Fidelity is lost and details are left out in this translation from a threaded discussion to a PowerPoint slide.

    The alternative is to use a wiki based platform, where a team can collaborate to formulate decision. But the problem with wiki, is the fluid nature of the platform. Once edits are made to a wiki page, it is almost impossible to tie the comments, thoughts, and input back to their author. Sure wikis provide a way to view the linear history edit, but how many of us go back to look at the history of a wiki page?

    What we need is a enterprise 2.0 style collaborative decision making software. This platform should allow teams members to collaboratively come to a decision by capturing input from each team member, and once a decision has been reached, it should turn to a workflow for approval by upper management. Once approved, it should automatically be routed to the appropriate team for implementation. If changes are made to the decision, it should create a new workflow.

    Saqib

  2. Barb Says:

    Saqib,
    Thanks for adding to this post, you have provided great thoughts for consideration!

  3. Decision Making « Sapientia et Doctrina Says:

    [...] Read More Tagged with: Decide, Decision, Decision Making leave a comment « Be a person who can be trusted. [...]

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>